On the very evening of a personnel meeting lasting about one hour, an employee submitted an eight-page “memorandum”: over 120 spoken contributions from four participants in the correct order, including verbal turns of phrase, sentence fragments, and speech errors. His smartphone had been lying on the table during the meeting.
Reasons for the decision:
The smartphone alone does not constitute reasonable suspicion; however, when combined with the length and verbatim nature of the transcript, it does. The court considered the claim that the transcript was based solely on memory to be implausible. The secret recording violates § 241(2) of the German Civil Code (BGB) and the right to the spoken word (Art. 2(1) in conjunction with Art. 1(1) of the German Basic Law (GG); a criminal offense under § 201(1)(1) of the German Criminal Code (StGB)). The breach of trust was so serious that a written warning was unnecessary and continued employment until the end of the regular notice period was unreasonable. Before issuing the termination, the employer had communicated the specific details of the suspicion in writing and granted the employee until June 10, 2025, to respond.
Recommendation for employers: